Punta Gorda PD make a different kind of arrest
Police: Myspace mission leads to sex arrest:
The police department of Punta Gorda, Florida have been featured on this site many times. Usually it’s for the arrest of some drug dealer that blatantly advertises on MySpace. This time they made a completely different kind of arrest.
Punta Gorda PD arrested 19-year-old Tyler Stancker of Pennsylvania. Stancker traveled from Pennsylvania to Florida in order to have sex with a 14-year-old girl he met on MySpace.
He is being charged with fourteen counts of Lewd Battery, two counts of Lewd and Lascivious Molestation, and one count of Prohibited Use of Computer Services.
He will be transported to the Charlotte County Jail for booking procedures where he will be held on no bond.
Wow, no bond. That’s pretty harsh. Not that he’ll get any sympathy from me. I still don’t understand why someone would travel that great a distance for a 14-year-old girl.
Tags: molestation, punta-gorda, Tyler-StanckerRelated Stories
POSTED IN: Predators
6 opinions for Punta Gorda PD make a different kind of arrest
...
Aug 4, 2007 at 6:06 pm
She told him she was 17!
...
Aug 4, 2007 at 6:08 pm
And he’s not a predator, SHE wanted him to go to Florida. He had no idea she was 14…
Trench
Aug 4, 2007 at 9:48 pm
Never heard that one before :roll:
malicous slaughter
Aug 14, 2007 at 3:26 am
you guys are terrible..
i understand the what we did was wrong but why would you make it sound worse than it is?
im still in love with that boy
and i know what we did was stupid
but if you saw it from my eyes and his then you would have known it was cause were in love..
my heart is completely broken
and it hurts that i cant see him for many years..
im so sorry for what i put him through
malicous slaughter
Aug 14, 2007 at 3:57 am
oh yea and by the way
he did know my age
if you would read into things more you would know
and yes i did want him to come down
but not on the sole purpose of sex.
thats rediculous
Zigs
Aug 14, 2007 at 4:27 am
“he did know my age”
I am Jack’s complete lack of surprise.
“but not on the sole purpose of sex.”
So sex and… other stuff?
No malice intended I’m just saying maybe the stituation was entirely different from the way you interpereted it.
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: